Ed Brown vs. Bob Gilkerson — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Ed Brown and Bob Gilkerson are closely matched on the surface stats. Bob Gilkerson had the edge in batting average (.200 vs .178). By the career numbers, Bob Gilkerson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Brown and Bob Gilkerson
Ed Brown
Career
Per 600 PA
0.178
0.178
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Ed Brown
Career
Per 600 PA
0.402
0.402
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Ed Brown
Career
Per 600 PA
0.201
0.201
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Ed Brown
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Ed Brown
Career
Per 600 PA
0.139
0.139
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Ed Brown
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Brown
Career
Per 600 PA
7.38
20.21
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
23.33
Fielding Stats for Ed Brown and Bob Gilkerson
Ed Brown
Career
Per 9 Innings
62
1.12
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ed Brown
Career
Per 9 Innings
158
2.86
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Ed Brown
Career
Per 9 Innings
128
2.32
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Ed Brown
Career
Per 9 Innings
81.01
81.01
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
50
Ed Brown
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.065
2.065
Bob Gilkerson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2