Jim Bottomley vs. Mark Budzinski — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Bottomley posted the stronger offensive profile against Mark Budzinski. Jim Bottomley posted stronger numbers in OPS (.869 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.369 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim Bottomley had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Bottomley and Mark Budzinski
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 600 PA
1991
142.98
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
4
342.86
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 600 PA
8355
600
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
7
600
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.029
0.029
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.369
0.369
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.291
0.291
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 600 PA
1442.16
103.57
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.74
-63.66
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 600 PA
591
42.44
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
4
342.86
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 600 PA
14.14
14.14
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
1.75
1.75
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 600 PA
33
2.37
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Bottomley and Mark Budzinski
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 9 Innings
1886
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 9 Innings
18337
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.38
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 9 Innings
19375
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.38
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 9 Innings
19152
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.38
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.85
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.155
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Jim Bottomley
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0