Ed Boland vs. Jim Small — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Small posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Boland. Jim Small posted stronger numbers in OPS (.658 vs .587) and on-base percentage (.318 vs .279). By the career numbers, Jim Small had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Boland and Jim Small
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.257
0.257
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.604
0.604
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.665
0.665
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.051
0.051
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.071
0.071
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.471
0.471
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.542
0.542
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
10
10
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
6.95
6.95
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.45
0.45
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
1
4.29
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
2
7.84
Fielding Stats for Ed Boland and Jim Small
Ed Boland
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
1.54
Ed Boland
Career
Per 9 Innings
85.19
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.71
95.71
Ed Boland
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.484
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.489
1.489