Ed Boland vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Boland posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Ed Boland posted stronger numbers in OPS (.587 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.279 vs .248). By the career numbers, Ed Boland had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Boland and Jim McLeod
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.257
0.257
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.604
0.604
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.309
0.309
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.051
0.051
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.471
0.471
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
13.3
57.01
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
10
10
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
1
4.29
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
2
8.57
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Ed Boland
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Fielding Stats for Ed Boland and Jim McLeod
Ed Boland
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Ed Boland
Career
Per 9 Innings
85.19
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7