Ned Bligh vs. Ed Chamberlain — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ned Bligh posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Chamberlain. Ned Bligh posted stronger numbers in OPS (.433 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.232 vs .000). By the career numbers, Ned Bligh had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ned Bligh and Ed Chamberlain
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 600 PA
66
173.68
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 600 PA
228
600
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
9
600
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.469
0.469
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.155
0.155
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 600 PA
35
92.11
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
15.2
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Fielding Stats for Ned Bligh and Ed Chamberlain
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
66
1.18
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.13
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1509
27
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
48
27
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
503
9
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
9
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
288
5.15
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
10.69
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
415
7.43
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
14.63
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
383
6.85
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
12.94
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.29
92.29
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.46
88.46
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.803
5.803
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
11.5
11.5
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
0.09
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.56
Ned Bligh
Career
Per 9 Innings
42
0.75
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0