Ed Blake vs. Tom Long — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Ed Blake and Tom Long are fairly close on the surface numbers. Tom Long posted stronger numbers in WHIP (2.000 vs 2.308) and home runs allowed (0 per nine innings vs 4.15). Ed Blake had the advantage in ERA (6.23 vs 9). By the career numbers, Tom Long had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.
Pitching Stats for Ed Blake and Tom Long
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
11.54
11.54
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.15
6.15
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.15
10.15
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
6
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.357
0.357
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.286
0.286
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
15.58
15.58
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.15
4.15
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.15
4.15
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.577
0.577
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.31
8.31
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
42
43.62
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
31.5
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.297
0.297
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.286
0.286
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
47.77
47.77
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
40.5
40.5
Fielding Stats for Ed Blake and Tom Long
Ed Blake
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
43.2
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
1