Phil Bickford vs. Clem Labine — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Phil Bickford and Clem Labine are fairly close on the surface numbers. Clem Labine posted stronger numbers in ERA (3.63 vs 4.62) and home runs allowed (0.68 per nine innings vs 1.33). Phil Bickford had the advantage in WHIP (1.302 vs 1.383). By the career numbers, Clem Labine had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.