Hal Bevan vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Hal Bevan posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Hal Bevan posted stronger numbers in OPS (.708 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.292 vs .248). By the career numbers, Hal Bevan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Hal Bevan and Jim McLeod
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.77
0.77
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
3.16
79.03
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
8
8
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
1
25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Fielding Stats for Hal Bevan and Jim McLeod
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
36
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
67.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Hal Bevan
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.875
1.875
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442