Jim Beswick vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .095). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Beswick and Unknown Proctor
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 600 PA
17
485.71
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 600 PA
21
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
57.14
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.095
0.095
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.055
0.055
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 600 PA
-1.76
-50.4
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
57.14
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Beswick and Unknown Proctor
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.74
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 9 Innings
93
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 9 Innings
33.33
33.33
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Beswick
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0