Art Benedict vs. Jim Byrnes — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Art Benedict posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Byrnes. Art Benedict posted stronger numbers in OPS (.600 vs .435) and on-base percentage (.267 vs .174). By the career numbers, Art Benedict had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Art Benedict and Jim Byrnes
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
15
600
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
23
600
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.435
0.435
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.067
0.067
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.087
0.087
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.144
0.144
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.455
0.455
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.316
0.316
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
1.4
55.91
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.97
25.29
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
3.75
3.75
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Art Benedict and Jim Byrnes
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.23
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
1.72
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
5.73
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
8.62
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
3.27
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
40
7.66
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
57.14
57.14
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.89
88.89
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.667
2.667
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.444
4.444
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.34