Tim Belk vs. Jaff Decker — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jaff Decker posted the stronger offensive profile against Tim Belk. Jaff Decker posted stronger numbers in OPS (.510 vs .450) and on-base percentage (.274 vs .250). Tim Belk had the advantage in batting average (.200 vs .174). By the career numbers, Jaff Decker had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tim Belk and Jaff Decker
Tim Belk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Tim Belk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.469
0.469
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.565
0.565
Tim Belk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.274
0.274
Tim Belk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Tim Belk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.46
0.46
Tim Belk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
33.73
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
11.73
36.83
Tim Belk
Career
Per 600 PA
8
8
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
4.06
4.06
Tim Belk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Fielding Stats for Tim Belk and Jaff Decker
Tim Belk
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.42
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
51
1.24
Tim Belk
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
0.95
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
38
0.92
Tim Belk
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
6.63
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
97
2.36
Tim Belk
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
6.63
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
93
2.26
Tim Belk
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.88
95.88
Tim Belk
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.667
4.667
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.824
1.824
Tim Belk
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Jaff Decker
Career
Per 9 Innings
74.51
74.51