Jeremy Beasley vs. Hank LaManna — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Jeremy Beasley and Hank LaManna are fairly close on the surface numbers. Hank LaManna posted stronger numbers in ERA (5.24 vs 5.84) and home runs allowed (0.68 per nine innings vs 2.55). Jeremy Beasley had the advantage in WHIP (1.581 vs 1.748). By the career numbers, Hank LaManna had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.