Jim Baxes vs. Art Benedict — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Baxes posted the stronger offensive profile against Art Benedict. Jim Baxes posted stronger numbers in OPS (.782 vs .600) and on-base percentage (.310 vs .267). Art Benedict had the advantage in batting average (.267 vs .246). By the career numbers, Jim Baxes had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Baxes and Art Benedict
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
308
600
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
15
600
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.246
0.246
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.786
0.786
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.42
0.42
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
39.08
76.14
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
1.26
50.41
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.311
0.311
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.471
0.471
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.067
0.067
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.258
0.258
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0.455
0.455
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
37.02
72.11
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
1.4
55.91
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
5.7
5.7
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
3.75
3.75
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 600 PA
15
29.22
Art Benedict
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Baxes and Art Benedict
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 9 Innings
80
1.09
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.23
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 9 Innings
328
4.47
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
5.73
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 9 Innings
311
4.23
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
3.27
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.82
94.82
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
57.14
57.14
Jim Baxes
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.888
3.888
Art Benedict
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.667
2.667