Rufus Battle vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Rufus Battle. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .264) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .148). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Rufus Battle and Jim McLeod
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
28
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.115
0.115
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.304
0.304
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
4
85.71
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.115
0.115
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.096
0.096
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Fielding Stats for Rufus Battle and Jim McLeod
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
1.56
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
4.68
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
4.68
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Rufus Battle
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7