Irv Bartling vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .224). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Irv Bartling and Unknown Proctor
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
14
164.71
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
51
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
2.64
31.04
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
11
129.41
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.161
0.161
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
2.57
30.27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
7.29
7.29
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Irv Bartling and Unknown Proctor
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Irv Bartling
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0