Scott Barnes vs. Al Tate — Career Comparison

Al Tate built a career as a starting pitcher and Scott Barnes as a reliever — different jobs with different demands — but on the metrics that apply to both, a comparison is still worth making. Al Tate posted stronger surface numbers — ERA 5 and WHIP 1.667 compared to 5.2 and 1.265 for Scott Barnes. By the career numbers, Al Tate had the better of this cross-role comparison — though era context would sharpen the verdict.