Scott Barlow vs. Oral Hildebrand — Career Comparison

Oral Hildebrand built a career as a starting pitcher and Scott Barlow as a reliever — different jobs with different demands — but on the metrics that apply to both, a comparison is still worth making. Scott Barlow posted stronger surface numbers — ERA 3.6 and WHIP 1.316 compared to 4.35 and 1.477 for Oral Hildebrand. By the career numbers, Scott Barlow had the better of this cross-role comparison — though era context would sharpen the verdict.