Clyde Barfoot vs. Kent Emanuel — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Clyde Barfoot and Kent Emanuel are fairly close on the surface numbers. Clyde Barfoot posted stronger numbers in ERA (4.1 vs 4.58) and home runs allowed (0.47 per nine innings vs 2.04). Kent Emanuel had the advantage in WHIP (1.217 vs 1.434). By the career numbers, Clyde Barfoot had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.