Rylan Bannon vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Rylan Bannon. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .243) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .143). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Rylan Bannon and Jim McLeod
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
21
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.262
0.262
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
3
85.71
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.089
0.089
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
2.63
2.63
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Fielding Stats for Rylan Bannon and Jim McLeod
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.22
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
3.41
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
3.41
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Rylan Bannon
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.8
2.8
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442