Jim Banning vs. Earl McNeely — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Earl McNeely posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Banning. Earl McNeely posted stronger numbers in OPS (.689 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.335 vs .000). By the career numbers, Earl McNeely had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Banning and Earl McNeely
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
3
1800
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 600 PA
683
161.47
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 600 PA
2538
600
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 600 PA
0.335
0.335
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 600 PA
0.239
0.239
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 600 PA
13.57
13.57
Fielding Stats for Jim Banning and Earl McNeely
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
4.5
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 9 Innings
609
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
7.5
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 9 Innings
1558
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
7.5
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 9 Innings
1519
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.5
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.667
1.667
Earl McNeely
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.494