Jim Banning vs. Frank McGowan — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Frank McGowan posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Banning. Frank McGowan posted stronger numbers in OPS (.698 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.347 vs .000). By the career numbers, Frank McGowan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Banning and Frank McGowan
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
3
1800
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 600 PA
375
157.89
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 600 PA
1425
600
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.348
0.348
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 600 PA
11.68
11.68
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Banning and Frank McGowan
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
4.5
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 9 Innings
327
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
7.5
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 9 Innings
790
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
7.5
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 9 Innings
766
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.96
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.667
1.667
Frank McGowan
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.343