Jim Banning vs. Henry Cotto — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Henry Cotto posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Banning. Henry Cotto posted stronger numbers in OPS (.672 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.302 vs .000). By the career numbers, Henry Cotto had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Banning and Henry Cotto
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
3
1800
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
884
227.35
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
2333
600
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.299
0.299
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
6.63
6.63
Jim Banning
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
49
12.6
Fielding Stats for Jim Banning and Henry Cotto
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
4.5
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
760
1.45
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
27
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
14146
27
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
9
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
4715.1
9
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
7.5
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
1371
2.62
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
7.5
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
1356
2.59
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.91
98.91
Jim Banning
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.667
1.667
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.784
1.784