Jim Ball vs. Paul Dade — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Paul Dade posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Ball. Paul Dade posted stronger numbers in OPS (.675 vs .362) and on-base percentage (.330 vs .185). By the career numbers, Paul Dade had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Ball and Paul Dade
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
0.137
0.137
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
0.391
0.391
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.709
0.709
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
0.185
0.185
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.328
0.328
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
0.177
0.177
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.345
0.345
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
0.039
0.039
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.075
0.075
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
0.128
0.128
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.619
0.619
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
4.23
4.23
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
7.59
7.59
Jim Ball
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
0.23
Paul Dade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.59
0.59
Fielding Stats for Jim Ball and Paul Dade
Jim Ball
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
1.15
Paul Dade
Career
Per 9 Innings
361
1.2
Jim Ball
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.01
Paul Dade
Career
Per 9 Innings
300
1
Jim Ball
Career
Per 9 Innings
78
5.62
Paul Dade
Career
Per 9 Innings
792
2.64
Jim Ball
Career
Per 9 Innings
74
5.33
Paul Dade
Career
Per 9 Innings
758
2.52
Jim Ball
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.87
94.87
Paul Dade
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.71
95.71
Jim Ball
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.625
4.625
Paul Dade
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
2.1
Jim Ball
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.5
87.5
Paul Dade
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.1
83.1