Jake Atz vs. Jim Rutherford — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Rutherford posted the stronger offensive profile against Jake Atz. Jim Rutherford posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .567) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .304). By the career numbers, Jim Rutherford had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jake Atz and Jim Rutherford
Jake Atz
Career
Per 600 PA
713
600
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Jake Atz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.218
0.218
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jake Atz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.638
0.638
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jake Atz
Career
Per 600 PA
59.04
49.69
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Jake Atz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.304
0.304
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jake Atz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.263
0.263
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jake Atz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Jake Atz
Career
Per 600 PA
65.46
55.09
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Jake Atz
Career
Per 600 PA
13.2
13.2
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Jake Atz and Jim Rutherford
Jake Atz
Career
Per 9 Innings
189
1.07
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.25
Jake Atz
Career
Per 9 Innings
4749
27
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Jake Atz
Career
Per 9 Innings
876
4.98
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.25
Jake Atz
Career
Per 9 Innings
833
4.74
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.25
Jake Atz
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.09
95.09
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jake Atz
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.407
4.407
Jim Rutherford
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1