Ed Atkinson vs. Jim Stephens — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Stephens posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Atkinson. Jim Stephens posted stronger numbers in OPS (.558 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.273 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim Stephens had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Atkinson and Jim Stephens
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 600 PA
2
150
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 600 PA
428
186.49
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 600 PA
8
600
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 600 PA
1377
600
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 600 PA
0.194
0.194
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 600 PA
8.15
8.15
Fielding Stats for Ed Atkinson and Jim Stephens
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.8
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 9 Innings
401
1.63
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
27
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 9 Innings
6630
27
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
9
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 9 Innings
2210
9
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 9 Innings
2306
9.39
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 9 Innings
2225
9.06
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.49
96.49
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.5
0.5
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.549
5.549
Ed Atkinson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Stephens
Career
Per 9 Innings
269
1.1