Jim Asbell vs. Polly Wolfe — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Asbell and Polly Wolfe are closely matched on the surface stats. Polly Wolfe posted stronger numbers in on-base percentage (.281 vs .250) and batting average (.207 vs .182). Jim Asbell had the advantage in slugging (.242 vs .207). By the career numbers, Polly Wolfe had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Asbell and Polly Wolfe
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
17
283.33
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
9
168.75
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.514
0.514
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
0.525
0.525
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
0.281
0.281
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
0.178
0.178
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.407
0.407
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.02
33.63
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
1.99
37.38
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
4.57
4.57
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 600 PA
0.43
0.43
Fielding Stats for Jim Asbell and Polly Wolfe
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Polly Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.5