Jim Asbell vs. Jack Ridley — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jack Ridley posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Asbell. Jack Ridley posted stronger numbers in OPS (.591 vs .492) and on-base percentage (.293 vs .250). By the career numbers, Jack Ridley had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Asbell and Jack Ridley
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
17
283.33
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
109
143.11
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
36
600
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
457
600
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.514
0.514
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.633
0.633
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2
33.33
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
17
22.32
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.181
0.181
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.19
36.52
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
40.25
52.85
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.293
0.293
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.061
0.061
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.068
0.068
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.407
0.407
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.535
0.535
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.02
33.63
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 600 PA
45.41
59.62
Fielding Stats for Jim Asbell and Jack Ridley
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 9 Innings
112
1.13
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
2.31
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.63
94.63
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.5
Jack Ridley
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.045
2.045