Jim Asbell vs. Hal Quick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Hal Quick posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Asbell. Hal Quick posted stronger numbers in OPS (.547 vs .492) and on-base percentage (.279 vs .250). By the career numbers, Hal Quick had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Asbell and Hal Quick
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.514
0.514
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.061
0.061
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.024
0.024
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.407
0.407
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.02
33.63
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
3.12
43.54
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
43
Fielding Stats for Jim Asbell and Hal Quick
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.73