Jim Asbell vs. Dixie Parsons — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Asbell posted the stronger offensive profile against Dixie Parsons. Jim Asbell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.492 vs .449) and on-base percentage (.250 vs .229). Dixie Parsons had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Asbell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Asbell and Dixie Parsons
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
17
283.33
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
108
201.87
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
36
600
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
321
600
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.176
0.176
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.514
0.514
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.479
0.479
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2
33.33
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
9
16.82
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.19
36.52
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
14.02
26.21
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.22
0.22
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.061
0.061
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.044
0.044
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.158
0.158
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.407
0.407
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.02
33.63
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
11.83
22.1
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
8.23
8.23
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.51
0.51
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
10
18.69
Fielding Stats for Jim Asbell and Dixie Parsons
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
106
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.92