Jim Asbell vs. Eddie Pace — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Asbell and Eddie Pace are closely matched on the surface stats. Eddie Pace posted stronger numbers in OPS (.513 vs .492) and on-base percentage (.290 vs .250). Jim Asbell had the advantage in slugging (.242 vs .222). By the career numbers, Eddie Pace had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Asbell and Eddie Pace
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 600 PA
0.185
0.185
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.514
0.514
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 600 PA
0.575
0.575
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.061
0.061
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 600 PA
0.037
0.037
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 600 PA
0.186
0.186
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.407
0.407
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.02
33.63
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 600 PA
2.39
46.33
Fielding Stats for Jim Asbell and Eddie Pace
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.21
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.97
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.86
92.86
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.5
Eddie Pace
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.625
1.625