Jim Asbell vs. Matt Joyce — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Matt Joyce posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Asbell. Matt Joyce posted stronger numbers in OPS (.772 vs .492) and on-base percentage (.346 vs .250). By the career numbers, Matt Joyce had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Asbell and Matt Joyce
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
17
283.33
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
1400
192.88
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
36
600
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
4355
600
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.514
0.514
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.785
0.785
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2
33.33
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
370
50.98
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.412
0.412
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.19
36.52
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
576.95
79.49
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.342
0.342
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.061
0.061
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.407
0.407
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.756
0.756
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.02
33.63
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
564.09
77.72
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
4.66
4.66
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 600 PA
76
10.47
Fielding Stats for Jim Asbell and Matt Joyce
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 9 Innings
1022
1.21
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 9 Innings
1662
1.97
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.29
98.29
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.5
Matt Joyce
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.626
1.626