Jim Asbell vs. Pete Fox — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete Fox posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Asbell. Pete Fox posted stronger numbers in OPS (.762 vs .492) and on-base percentage (.347 vs .250). By the career numbers, Pete Fox had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Asbell and Pete Fox
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
17
283.33
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
1461
142.12
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.514
0.514
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.78
0.78
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.347
0.347
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.415
0.415
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.061
0.061
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.117
0.117
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.407
0.407
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.715
0.715
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.02
33.63
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
876.68
85.28
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
13.1
13.1
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.83
0.83
Fielding Stats for Jim Asbell and Pete Fox
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Pete Fox
Career
Per 9 Innings
1368