Jim Asbell vs. Daniel Fields — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Daniel Fields posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Asbell. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .492) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .250). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Asbell and Daniel Fields
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
36
600
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.514
0.514
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.19
36.52
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.55
109.5
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.061
0.061
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.02
33.63
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Fielding Stats for Jim Asbell and Daniel Fields
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67