Scott Arnold vs. Lum Davenport — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Scott Arnold and Lum Davenport are fairly close on the surface numbers. Scott Arnold posted stronger numbers in ERA (5.4 vs 7.71) and home runs allowed (0 per nine innings vs 0.46). Lum Davenport had the advantage in WHIP (1.954 vs 2.100). By the career numbers, Scott Arnold had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.