Mule Armstrong vs. Al Richter — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Mule Armstrong and Al Richter are closely matched on the surface stats. Mule Armstrong posted stronger numbers in slugging (.250 vs .091) and batting average (.125 vs .091). Al Richter had the advantage in on-base percentage (.286 vs .125). By the career numbers, Mule Armstrong had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Mule Armstrong and Al Richter
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
8
600
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.464
0.464
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.151
0.151
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
Fielding Stats for Mule Armstrong and Al Richter
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
6.5
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
6
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.31
92.31
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
100