Mule Armstrong vs. Liz Funk — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Liz Funk posted the stronger offensive profile against Mule Armstrong. Liz Funk posted stronger numbers in OPS (.688 vs .375) and on-base percentage (.322 vs .125). By the career numbers, Liz Funk had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Mule Armstrong and Liz Funk
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
8
600
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
1088
600
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.714
0.714
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.264
0.264
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
19.27
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
118.55
65.38
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.322
0.322
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.367
0.367
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.099
0.099
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.236
0.236
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.632
0.632
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
0.01
0.56
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
129.25
71.28
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 600 PA
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
18.76
18.76
Fielding Stats for Mule Armstrong and Liz Funk
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1
Liz Funk
Career
Per 9 Innings
251
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
6
Liz Funk
Career
Per 9 Innings
695
Mule Armstrong
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.31
92.31
Liz Funk
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.2