Dan Ardell vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Dan Ardell. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .650) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .400). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dan Ardell and Jim Smith
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Fielding Stats for Dan Ardell and Jim Smith
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
13
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100