Dan Ardell vs. Frank Graves — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Dan Ardell posted the stronger offensive profile against Frank Graves. Dan Ardell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.650 vs .360) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .193). By the career numbers, Dan Ardell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dan Ardell and Frank Graves
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
145
600
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.152
0.152
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.441
0.441
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.129
0.129
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.66
65.95
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
4.24
17.55
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
3.02
3.02
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Fielding Stats for Dan Ardell and Frank Graves
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
1.08
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
27
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
1128
27
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
13
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
345
8.26
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
13
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
304
7.28
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.12
88.12
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
13
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.756
6.756