Dan Ardell vs. Mike Bell — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Dan Ardell and Mike Bell are closely matched on the surface stats. Mike Bell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.767 vs .650) and slugging (.444 vs .250). Dan Ardell had the advantage in on-base percentage (.400 vs .323). By the career numbers, Mike Bell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dan Ardell and Mike Bell
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Mike Bell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Mike Bell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Mike Bell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.323
0.323
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Mike Bell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Mike Bell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Mike Bell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.762
0.762
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.66
65.95
Mike Bell
Career
Per 600 PA
4.27
82.62
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Mike Bell
Career
Per 600 PA
4.43
4.43
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mike Bell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.57
0.57
Fielding Stats for Dan Ardell and Mike Bell
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Mike Bell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
2.36
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Mike Bell
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
0.72
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
13
Mike Bell
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
3.26
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Mike Bell
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
13
Mike Bell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.385
1.385
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Mike Bell
Career
Per 9 Innings
30.77
30.77