Jim Archer vs. Steven Matz — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Jim Archer and Steven Matz are fairly close on the surface numbers. Jim Archer posted stronger numbers in ERA (3.94 vs 4.19) and home runs allowed (0.73 per nine innings vs 1.33). Steven Matz had the advantage in WHIP (1.322 vs 1.373). By the career numbers, Jim Archer had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.