Maurice Archdeacon vs. Ed Hug — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Ed Hug had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .413). By the career numbers, Ed Hug had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Maurice Archdeacon and Ed Hug
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 600 PA
127
169.71
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 600 PA
449
600
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.825
0.825
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 600 PA
180
240.53
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.413
0.413
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.283
0.283
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 600 PA
73.38
98.05
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 600 PA
11.51
11.51
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Maurice Archdeacon and Ed Hug
Maurice Archdeacon
Career
Per 9 Innings
98
Ed Hug
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9