Luke Appling vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Luke Appling. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .798) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .399). Luke Appling had the advantage in home run production (45 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Luke Appling and Jim Smith
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
10243
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.31
0.31
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.816
0.816
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
1488.21
87.17
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.399
0.399
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.398
0.398
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.088
0.088
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.791
0.791
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
1608.48
94.22
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
19.4
19.4
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Luke Appling
Career
Per 600 PA
129
7.56
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Luke Appling and Jim Smith
Luke Appling
Career
Per 9 Innings
2359
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Luke Appling
Career
Per 9 Innings
12889
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Luke Appling
Career
Per 9 Innings
12217
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Luke Appling
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.79
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100