Dean Anna vs. Jimmy McMath — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Dean Anna posted the stronger offensive profile against Jimmy McMath. Dean Anna posted stronger numbers in OPS (.497 vs .286) and on-base percentage (.192 vs .143). Jimmy McMath had the advantage in batting average (.143 vs .130). By the career numbers, Dean Anna had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dean Anna and Jimmy McMath
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.13
0.13
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.304
0.304
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.45
0.45
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
4.33
4.33
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 600 PA
2.33
2.33
Fielding Stats for Dean Anna and Jimmy McMath
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.75
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.13
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
0.94
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.13
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
3.36
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
2.25
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
3.22
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
2.25
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
96
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.846
1.846
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
53.85
53.85
Jimmy McMath
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100