Dean Anna vs. Ed Glenn — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Dean Anna and Ed Glenn are closely matched on the surface stats. Ed Glenn posted stronger numbers in OPS (.510 vs .497) and on-base percentage (.245 vs .192). Dean Anna had the advantage in slugging (.304 vs .265). By the career numbers, Ed Glenn had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dean Anna and Ed Glenn
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.13
0.13
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.202
0.202
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.552
0.552
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.189
0.189
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.044
0.044
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.002
0.002
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.009
0.009
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.245
0.245
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.304
0.304
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.063
0.063
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.177
0.177
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
4.33
4.33
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
46.25
46.25
Fielding Stats for Dean Anna and Ed Glenn
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.75
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
137
1.01
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
3.36
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
317
2.35
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
3.22
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
275
2.04
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
96
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
86.75
86.75
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.846
1.846
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.007
2.007