Dean Anna vs. Daniel Fields — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Daniel Fields posted the stronger offensive profile against Dean Anna. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .497) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .192). Dean Anna had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dean Anna and Daniel Fields
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.13
0.13
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
1.89
43.61
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.55
109.5
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.304
0.304
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
1.23
28.33
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
4.33
4.33
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Fielding Stats for Dean Anna and Daniel Fields
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.75
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
3.36
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.86
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
3.22
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
96
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.846
1.846
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2