Matt Angle vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Matt Angle posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Matt Angle posted stronger numbers in OPS (.559 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.293 vs .248). Jim McLeod had the advantage in batting average (.203 vs .177). By the career numbers, Matt Angle had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Matt Angle and Jim McLeod
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.177
0.177
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.687
0.687
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
27
170.53
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.294
0.294
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.266
0.266
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.089
0.089
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.199
0.199
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.682
0.682
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
8.64
54.55
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
7.31
7.31
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
0.92
0.92
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
12
75.79
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Matt Angle
Career
Per 600 PA
91.67
91.67
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Fielding Stats for Matt Angle and Jim McLeod
Matt Angle
Career
Per 9 Innings
29
1.31
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Matt Angle
Career
Per 9 Innings
62
2.81
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Matt Angle
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.88
96.88
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Matt Angle
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.138
2.138
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442