Kim Andrew vs. Tracy Woodson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Tracy Woodson. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .611) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .283). Tracy Woodson had the advantage in home run production (5 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Tracy Woodson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
215
241.12
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
535
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.247
0.247
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.62
0.62
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
44.74
50.18
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.328
0.328
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.208
0.208
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
47.36
53.11
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
6.86
6.86
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 600 PA
10
11.21
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Tracy Woodson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
187
1.47
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
3428
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1142.2
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
517
4.07
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
500
3.94
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.71
96.71
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Tracy Woodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.674
2.674