Kim Andrew vs. Parnell Woods — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Parnell Woods. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .741) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .339). Parnell Woods had the advantage in home run production (5 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Parnell Woods
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
214
142.83
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
899
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
0.291
0.291
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
0.782
0.782
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
121.09
80.82
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
300
200.22
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
0.339
0.339
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
0.402
0.402
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
0.253
0.253
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
133.82
89.31
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 600 PA
224.75
224.75
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Parnell Woods
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
1.09
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 9 Innings
5201
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 9 Innings
1733.2
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 9 Innings
627
3.25
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 9 Innings
580
3.01
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.5
92.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Parnell Woods
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.762
2.762