Kim Andrew vs. Tack Wilson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Tack Wilson. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .929) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .429). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Tack Wilson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.938
0.938
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.38
103.54
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.35
101.07
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Tack Wilson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
2.65
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.06
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.06
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tack Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100