Kim Andrew vs. Artie Wilson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Artie Wilson. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .888) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .428). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Artie Wilson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
541
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.367
0.367
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.913
0.913
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
102.01
113.14
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.428
0.428
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
109.05
120.95
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
180.33
180.33
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Artie Wilson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
120
1.15
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2826
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
617
5.89
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
591
5.65
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.79
95.79
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Artie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.925
4.925